Napisany przez jadburner (Post 1396249)

I have also observed the same thing where Mediatek-based drives scan certain MIDs much better than BenQ drives. It is far more common than the other way around. Even stranger, BenQ drives often do not like Pioneer DVR-X16 and DVR-X17 DVD-R burns, and several years ago a user on MyCE recommended not using Nexperia drives to scan such burns.

I do recall cases where BenQ drives scanned certain MIDs much better than Mediatek drives, but I cannot recall exactly which MIDs at the moment.

Napisany przez jadburner (Post 1396251)

CMC Pro (Powered by TY) Value 8x DVD-R
White inkjet hub printable
TYG02 (Made in Taiwan)
SW-5583 (1.03)
@ 6x

Napisany przez jadburner (Post 1396252)

CMC Pro (Powered by TY) Value 8x DVD-R
White inkjet hub printable
TYG02 (Made in Taiwan)
SW-5583 (1.03)
@ 8x

Napisany przez zenonz (Post 1395873)

How to interpret these results? On one hand great scans on MTK-based units and Plextor (no idea which chipset they used), while BenQ and Panasonic don't like it. I have observed similar phenomena on Ritek F16 discs burned on BenQ 1620 (missing strategy for that media), and my assumption is that the disc may show compatibility issues on some readers (i.e. TRT on Panasonic burner showing drop), but have no evidence for that ;)

Have you ever observed the contrary - excellent scans on BenQ and mediocre/poor result on MTK-based units?